![]() ![]() Now if initial url is like and getquerynamevaluepairs get called then no issue because getquerynamevaluepairs first check query string present or not. Now if somebody write messagehandler and try to modify url then it will get from cache result. This method cache result in request.Properties with key MS_QueryNameValuePairs. ![]() If somebody called this method of HttpRequestMessage ( Actually Present in HttpRequestMessageExtensions) ĭuring investigation and finding solution for that I came across following thing. I came across one question on stackoverflow. I ran across this problem when trying to write my own EditorFor Extension which should automatically add title and placeholder attributes generated from the DisplayAttribute for the property.įor this scenario i need support for both additionalViewData and htmlAttributes being a Dictionary. ![]() (The middle case works only because we accepted a pull request which fixed #1687 recently.)Ĭomments: I need the support for the third scenario (""). Note the `"foo"` attribute is missing in the final case. That is dynamic scenarios work for `htmlAttributes` but not `additionalViewData`. This means these extension methods cannot easily be called with additional view data collected at runtime. No overloads accepting `IDictionary` exist. Unlike how we handle `htmlAttributes` in other extensions, these parameters are of type `object`. `html.EditorFor()`) extensions all have overloads accepting an `additionalViewData` parameter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |